At first glance, that claim might sound like clickbait — but it’s a direct quote from an interview with legendary Magnum photographer David Hurn. Hurn has documented subjects as diverse as Beatlemania and the Hungarian Revolution of 1956. Now in his nineties, he is as sharp and incisive as someone half his age.
In the interview, Hurn offered a simple idea, but one so fundamental to the craft that it demands a total reset in how most photographers set their priorities.
“There are only two controls in photography.
Where you stand, and when you push the button.”
Once you grasp the idea behind those words, they’re hard to ignore. Once you start looking at your own (or others’) pictures through that lens, a pattern emerges quickly: the images that work aren’t always the ones created with the “best” gear or the “perfect” settings. They’re the ones where the photographer made two decisions well—position and timing—everything else simply supported those decisions.
And this isn’t limited to a particular genre:
Landscape, Portrait, Street, Wildlife, Macro or Still life? Doesn’t matter.
Phone camera, crop sensor, full-frame, or large-format? Doesn’t matter.
The subject or the equipment may change, but the two controls remain the same. Grasping the importance of this single idea will improve almost every photograph you make.
What “Control” really means here
When photographers talk about “control,” they usually mean camera settings: aperture, shutter speed, ISO, white balance, and so on. Those matter: they shape how a photograph is rendered — sharpness, motion, noise, depth of field and tonal placement.
But those controls affect only how the scene is recorded.
Hurn’s two controls point to something more fundamental: the decisions that shape what the photograph is — its structure, its relationships, its meaning, and the moment it implies..
Good technique can rescue a lot. But it can’t rescue a weak viewpoint or a missed moment. On the other hand, a strong position and a well-chosen moment can survive all kinds of technical imperfection.
So let’s talk about those two controls the way photographers actually use them in the field.
The First Control: Where You Stand
“Where you stand” sounds almost too simple — until you realize what it changes. Move a few steps, and you haven’t just “reframed” the subject; you’ve changed the geometry of the world in your frame.
Position controls perspective and relationships.
Perspective
Perspective refers to the relative size differences between elements in the foreground and background. Perspective changes as you move closer or farther from your physical subject. Perspective creates the illusion of the converging lines and the feeling of depth or compression. Moving closer to a foreground object in your frame will make it appear larger in relation to objects in the background. Moving farther back has the opposite effect.
A common misconception is that lens choice determines perspective.
It does not.
Perspective is determined by position — where you stand.
Here’s a simple experiment to demonstrate this. Use a telephoto lens and frame a scene with a clear foreground object and background elements at varying distances. Choose an aperture that keeps the background reasonably sharp, and make one exposure. Without moving the camera, switch to a wide-angle lens and photograph the same scene at the same aperture.
The wide-angle image will include more of the scene, and all objects will appear smaller within the frame. Now open that wide-angle image in any editing program, crop it, and enlarge it to match the framing of the telephoto image
The image quality will differ— but the perspective will not. The size relationships between foreground and background elements will be identical, because your position did not change.
Now return to the field. Leave the wide-angle lens on the camera and move closer to the foreground object until it appears roughly the same size in the viewfinder as it did in the original telephoto image. This time, the image will suggest a much greater distance between foreground and background elements.
That change in perspective comes from changing position, not from changing lenses.
This is the same principle behind wide-angle images of railroad tracks or highways that appear to converge dramatically, and telephoto images that seem to compress distant mountain ridges into tight layers. In every case, the effect is produced by position. The lens only determines how much of that perspective is included in the frame.
The key revelation is this:
Images made from the same position — regardless of focal length — share identical perspective relationships.
Distance Alone Determines Perspective
Same position, Same camera, Three lenses
The right-hand image was made with a 300 mm lens. Without moving the camera, the same scene was photographed again using a 105 mm lens and then a 35 mm lens. Each image was cropped and enlarged to match the 200 mm framing.
In every case, the apparent distance between foreground and background elements remains identical. Shorter focal lengths simply capture a wider field of view, making objects appear smaller within the frame. Perspective itself is determined solely by camera position, not by lens choice.
Why Lenses Don’t Change Perspective
It’s Where You Stand, Not What You Use
The belief that lenses “create” perspective comes from how we tend to use them. We move closer and choose a wide-angle lens to include more of the scene. We step back and reach for a telephoto to isolate something distant. It’s the change in position — not the lens — that alters perspective.
In the image on the left (or the first image above on mobile), the camera is positioned close to the cypress trees. Including both trees and their surroundings required a wide-angle lens (18 mm, full-frame equivalent). From this position, the foreground trees appear exaggerated in size, the road widens dramatically toward the camera, and the distant hilltop villa recedes sharply.
In the image on the right (or second image above), a long telephoto lens (300 mm, full-frame equivalent) was used. Here, distant mountain ridges appear tightly stacked, even though they are separated by many miles. This “compression” occurs because the camera is much farther from the nearest ridge than the ridges are from each other. In both images, perspective is governed entirely by camera position. The lens determines framing — not spatial relationships. By contrast, in the wide-angle image, the distance from the camera to the trees is only 1/100 of the distance to the distant hilltop villa.
Get the next essay automatically
One short email when I publish—no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
“Standing” is a Verb.
Move your feet to change meaning, not just framing.
Where you choose to stand isn’t just a point on a map. It includes camera height, angle, and tilt — and, critically, your willingness to move.
That movement might involve crouching lower, leaning slightly, stepping left or right to remove a merger, moving closer to simplify a composition, backing up to give a subject space, or climbing a single stair to change alignment. A common mistake is treating lens choice as a substitute for movement.
Zooming changes framing. Moving changes relationships.
Longer focal lengths can isolate a subject; shorter focal lengths allow you to move closer while showing the subject in context. Focal length affects perspective only indirectly, because changing lenses often causes you to move. The true control remains the same: your position relative to the subject and background.
A few steps can save the day
You notice a compelling subject — a person in beautiful light, a tree on a ridge, a textured doorway. You make the obvious photograph. When you review it, the result is… just OK. The image feels cluttered or accidental. A bright object pulls the eye. A line intersects the head. The background competes.
Step left or right, and the distraction disappears. Step forward and the subject gains weight. Crouch slightly and the background cleans up. Nothing about the subject changed — but the photograph did.
That’s the power of where you stand.
Separation and Mergers:
While camera-to-subject distance controls perspective, lateral and vertical movements play a different but equally important role. Small shifts left, right, up, or down determine whether a subject reads clearly against its background or disappears into it.
One of the most common compositional problems is the merger — when similarly toned shapes overlap and lose their distinct identities. Mergers weaken visual clarity and are especially common in backlit or silhouetted scenes, though they can occur in any lighting.
Often, eliminating a merger requires nothing more than a slight change in position.
In the diagram (below, if you are on a mobile device) the subject stands in front of a grove of evergreen trees, with a lone tree farther back. The blue line represents an implied horizon. The subject merges with the trees behind him.
Moving the camera slightly to the left shifts the subject relative to both background elements, clearing the merger. Because the lone tree is much farther away, it shifts position differently than the closer trees.
Lowering the camera and tilting upward lowers the apparent horizon and raises the subject against the sky, enhancing separation and increasing the subject’s apparent stature.
Raising the camera has the opposite effect: it raises the horizon, pushes the subject downward relative to the background, and tends to diminish apparent stature.
A Case of “Do as I Say, Not as I Do”
This image is a “where you stand” near-miss. The left edge of the cross merges with the cypress tree behind it. Two steps left would have separated the cross from the trees and revealed its silhouette cleanly against the sky.
It’s a reminder of a simple habit worth reinforcing:
- Check silhouettes and edges
- Watch for objects “kissing” or overlapping
- Remember that a step or two is often all it takes to restore clarity
Portrait of Margaret Thatcher, © Peter Marlow / Magnum Photos
This image by Elliott Erwitt reinforces the popular belief that dog owners often look like their pets. Erwitt used up most of the entire roll of film looking for the precise position and precise instant when the forms merged, creating this comical and somewhat absurd image. Image © Elliott Erwitt / Magnum Photos
Reading the Frame: Layers and Edges
Layers
Layers can be created in many ways. A landscape might be organized into foreground, middle ground, and background. A macro subject can be layered against soft, swirling colour by using a wide aperture to limit depth of field.
But the layers most sensitive to small positional changes are those created by natural or man-made shapes arranged on top of one another. When an image contains shapes that can form layers, small lateral movements often determine whether those layers stack in a confusing way or resolve into a clear visual hierarchy. A step left or right can make — or break — a layered composition.
Layers can be created and used in your images in several ways. A landscape can be composed with a distinct foreground, middle and background. A macro subject can be layered against a background of swirling colour by shooting with a larger aperture to limit depth of field. But the layers most sensitive to small positional changes are those involving natural or man-made shapes arrayed on one another.
If your image contains shapes that could form layers, lateral movements can determine whether those layers stack in a confusing way or create a clean hierarchy. Small adjustments to either the right or left will easily make or break a layered composition.
Frame Edges
Lateral and vertical movements also strongly affect what appears at the edges of your frame — one of the most overlooked aspects of composition.
Edges govern what touches the frame boundary, what gets clipped, and what distracts. Elements near the edge of a photograph tend to pick up visual weight, drawing the viewer’s eye more strongly than objects near the center.
Often, a small movement is all that’s needed to remove a distraction or pull it away from the frame edge. A slightly elevated viewpoint can eliminate foreground intrusions and often reveals patterns hidden from lower positions.
Make a habit of scanning the edges of your frame before pressing the shutter. Few practices will strengthen your compositions more quickly.
Position determines geometry
Small movements, large consequences
Much of what we’ve discussed so far comes back to a single idea: where you stand determines the geometry of your photograph.
Your position controls how elements relate to one another, and even small changes in viewpoint can dramatically change how an image feels. That influence shows up in several key ways:
Alignment: Take a step or lower the camera slightly, and verticals and horizontals may suddenly fall into place — or drift apart. Where you stand determines whether lines remain parallel, converge, or distort, quietly setting the image’s visual tone.
Symmetry: Stand centred in a symmetrical scene — a hallway, a façade — and the image feels calm and balanced. Step off center and the symmetry breaks, creating tension or movement. The subject hasn’t changed; only your position has.
Leading Lines: Leading lines are especially sensitive to viewpoint. Photograph a road from low and close, and it pulls the viewer into the frame. Photograph the same road from higher up, and it may flatten into a graphic shape.
Patterns: Patterns emerge through repetition — tiles, windows, market stalls, rows of flowers. Your position determines whether repetition reads as pattern or dissolves into clutter. A straight-on, frame-filling view — often from above — is frequently required. Sometimes, simply getting higher reveals patterns most people never notice.
Spacing and Balance: Finally, position controls how space is distributed in the frame. A higher viewpoint may spread elements apart, creating balance and breathing room.
In every case, the subject remains the same. Only your position changes — and that’s the point. One of the most powerful creative controls you have isn’t a camera setting. It’s where you choose to stand.
Distance and Relationships
Distance shapes more than perspective; it shapes emotional connection. It determines whether the viewer feels like a participant in the scene or a distant observer.
Think of a conversation across a restaurant table. Leaning in creates intimacy and engagement. Sitting farther away, perhaps a few tables away, changes the relationship — you’re no longer part of the exchange, you’re watching it.
Photography works the same way. Moving closer to a subject — often with a wider-than-normal lens — doesn’t just change geometry; it changes relationship. The subject hasn’t moved, and the lens may be the same, but the distance alters how connected the image feels.
Composition should be less about rules and more about relationships. A photograph isn’t a subject; it’s a subject in relation to everything else in the frame.
Getting closer moves the viewer from the role of observer to participant — and that shift can be felt immediately.
Getting close to your subject changes the perspective of the image. Moving from the role of observer to that of participant engages your viewers with the subject and their environment.
Creative Exercise: The 10-Step Frame
Pick one subject—anything—and make ten photographs without changing focal length.
- Don’t zoom.
- Don’t change your exposure settings unless you have to.
- Change only your position:
- forward/back, left/right, higher/lower, slight rotations.
- Which image is the clearest?
- Which has the best background?
- Which has the strongest visual hierarchy?
- What changed that made it better?
Pay close attention to distractions — elements that contribute nothing but draw the eye. Every element should support the image’s meaning. Anything that doesn’t add to the story takes away from it.
Anything that doesn’t add to your story automatically takes away from it.
The Second Control: When You Press the Button
The second control is timing — pressing the shutter at the moment when the photograph becomes complete. This isn’t limited to street photography or so-called “decisive moments.” Timing matters in landscapes, portraiture, wildlife, still life, and abstract work, because the world is always changing — even when it appears still.
“Timing is meaning, not just mechanics.”
— Carlo Ravelli
Timing creates context and meaning. The moment you choose determines whether a gesture feels awkward or graceful, whether an expression is revealed or withheld, whether the photograph resolves or remains a near-miss.
It’s the instant when elements align: a subject steps into the right space, clears a horizon line, or a hand reaches precisely the right position.
Timing also governs light. A cloud edge opens. Reflections appear. Highlights shift. A fraction of a second can be the difference between a photograph that feels complete and one that does not. Timing shapes narrative as well — because two frames made moments apart may suggest entirely different stories.
Timing is a skill, and like any skill, it improves with practice. It requires anticipation — learning how people move, how waves form, how light shifts through clouds. Above all, it requires patience: staying long enough for the frame to resolve.
Good timing isn’t luck. It’s attention.
The frame is set, but the moment is yet to arrive
You choose a position that creates a strong arrangement of visual elements. The photograph is nearly there — but something is unfinished. The gesture hasn’t resolved. The light hasn’t settled. The wind is turning your foreground into chaos.
So you wait.
A few seconds later, the wind dies. A person turns their head. The clouds shift and the light falls exactly where it needs to be. You press the shutter.
That wasn’t luck. You recognized what was missing and waited for it.
This isn’t always about split-second timing. Cartier-Bresson’s “decisive moment” sometimes takes time to arrive — and may last longer than a heartbeat. What matters is understanding what needs to happen to complete the image, and recognizing when it does.
When “Where” and “When” work together?
Here’s the part that turns the David Hurn quote from clever to practical: Where and When are not independent decisions.
Changing position may change which moment matters. Waiting may reveal positions you couldn’t see while rushing. Often, the strongest photographs emerge from a simple shift in approach:
- Find the position with the strongest arrangement of visual elements.
- Ask, “What needs to happen to complete this image?”
- If the answer is “nothing,” hit the shutter.
- If not, wait —and be open to changing position as the scene develops
If either position or timing is weak, the photograph feels incomplete. When both are strong, the image feels intentional—like it couldn’t have been made any other way.
Position sets the stage. Timing delivers the line.
— Edward R. Murrow
Same Place, Different Time, Different Meaning
You photograph a scene in flat light: descriptive, quiet, perhaps a bit boring. Moments later, a break in the clouds sends a slash of light across part of the frame. Suddenly, the photograph has a subject. It has drama. It has a hierarchy.
Same location. Same camera. Same lens.
A different “when” changed the emotional tone of the image.
Waiting for the Light, Colour and Moment to Come Together
The raised arm is the moment—timing turns two figures into a story.
Timing is often about quiet observation — watching and waiting with a camera to eye, for that fleeting instant when all the elements: light, colour and gesture align.*
* Light, Colour & Gesture is also the title of a book by Jay Maisel. Highly recommended.
Position and Timing are Rarely Independent Decisions
The right position is often a prerequisite for finding the right time — the instant when everything comes together.
I can only lay claim to choosing the right time, for it was only by dumb luck that I happened to be standing in the right place to catch these two biplanes as they came across the top of a loop with their smoke on.
Sometimes luck is involved.
But position sets the stage — timing catches the peak
Creative Exercise: The Five-Minute Watch
This could also be a 20- or 40-minute watch, if you’re so inclined. Find an interesting scene, perhaps just something that creates an interesting background. Find your shooting location, frame up a pleasing arrangement of shape, colour, and form, and then wait. Shoot only when something changes meaningfully.
Not “more frames = better,” but the opposite:..
- In those five minutes, ask yourself:
- What am I waiting for?
- What would make the frame feel complete?
- Shoot only when the answer appears.
Then review your frames and identify the one image that feels like the sentence—not just a collection of words.
Putting it all in Context
Camera settings still matter — but they can’t rescue poor position or bad timing. Think of them as working in service of the two main controls.
Settings help you:
- Hold highlights or embrace silhouette
- Freeze gesture or suggest motion
- Separate a subject or preserve context
- Shape tonality and colour to match mood
Those choices matter. But they don’t substitute for viewpoint or timing. They support them.
Think of it this way:
- Where you stand + when you hit the shutter determine structure and meaning.
- Settings and processing determine how that structure is rendered.
Or, more bluntly:
- If you didn’t stand in the right place, the best settings won’t save it.
- If you hit the shutter at the wrong moment, perfect technique won’t fix it.
Photography can get complicated quickly—gear, settings, software, workflows, endless opinions. But the heart of it is deceptively simple.
Every photograph rests on two decisions:
- Where you stand — the relationships you choose, the background you accept, the image you design.
- When you press the button — the moment that completes the frame,
The camera records. The photographer decides.
— author unknown
And the most powerful decision you can practice today isn’t a new setting or a new tool. It’s moving your feet with intention—and waiting long enough to recognize the moment when the picture finally becomes a photograph.
Want to be notified when I publish the next essay? Subscribe here.
One short email—no spam. Unsubscribe anytime
This essay is part of an ongoing series exploring how photographs are shaped more by choices than by gear.
Would you consider sharing this essay?
If you found this essay useful or enjoyable, and think someone you know might enjoy it as well, I’d be grateful if you passed it along.
Share by email
Thoughtful discussion is welcome. Comments may be moderated for clarity and relevance.